<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://irregularideation.blog/2026/10/10/one-standard-for-all-consent-risk-and-the-cornell-fraternity-case/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Irregular Ideation</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-10-11T01:26:11+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>One Standard for All: Consent, Risk, and the Cornell Fraternity Case</news:title><news:keywords>personal responsibility, equal justice, Cornell sexual assault, Chi Phi fraternity, consent and intoxication, New York rape law, voluntary intoxication, campus party culture, pornification of sex, male impulse control, tribalism left and right, teaching respect, bystander intervention, affirmative consent, risk reduction</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://irregularideation.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/grok_image_14vn4r.jpg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>