Back in my school days, I got caught trying to make a weapon in shop class. Being a boy, I was fascinated by those Nightsticks used by police and thought I could get away with this flagrant violation of rules. But very early into this project the teacher, who had been around the block, confronted me and gave the cease and desist order. However, rather than owning up to it, I went the route of plausible deniability and claimed that I was actually building a stool.


Likewise, some people when seeing many not happy with sacred Christian tradition being mocked tried to play off the display as a depiction of a Greek Bacchal Banquet. Whether you believe that explanation or not is up to you. However, in either case, this was an obscene celebration of debauchery that had absolutely nothing to do with the Olympics. And, no, that’s not coming from a prudish angle, rather Bacchus (not on Mt Olympus) was never a part of the Ancient Olympics. So this clever response by apologists, like “Rev Cassie Rapko” (dutifully quoted in the Daily Mail), falls flat.


This new official explanation repeated over and over again in headlines, that “nothing to see here” denial of the Christian imagery in this depiction, also contradicts what these performers themselves had said before the damage control effort, as reported in their own words, “took inspiration from Leonardo da Vinci’s famous painting to create the setting.” One of them even doubled down on the insult in a post that was later deleted after the narrative shifted. The back peddling and gaslighting is incredible and it just goes to how unreliable our sources of information really have become. This is an example of revisionist history in real-time:

The irony of the bizarre “It’s not the Last Supper, but The Feast of the Gods,” cover story is first that the explanation before the fury (above) is still online, and second that this painting by Dutch artist Jan van Bijlert was itself inspired by da Vinci’s The Last Supper:

And it is not so much about this one act as it is the meanspirited pattern of ridicule (and very deliberate misrepresentation) of Christianity by the left in part of a campaign of debasement and demoralization. It is cultural vandalism, not art, and should be identified as such. The left regularly betrays the love and tolerance it claims to stand for—only to greet with a Judas kiss acting as if they’ve done nothing wrong to deserve rebuke.
“It’s just art!”
Try that excuse for spinning out on one of those rainbow flags painted on a roadway, see how it turns out.

At the end of it all, the hypocrisy on the part of the fake tolerant “kindness is everything” left is expected. They are the civilizational equivalent of a plague of locusts, destroying all in their path and lacking any actual moral direction. Sure, they’ll appropriate Christian morality, most especially when it is useful for bludgeoning others, but principles are for those trying to build. The left lacks any creative power, which is why they parody and mock what is beautiful, what is meaningful, and truly life-giving in the world. This isn’t even speaking from a Christian perspective, what truly awe-inspiring comes from these clowns other than their stupidity?

The need to recognize a bunch of talentless slobs, in the name of their false diversity, equity, and inclusion, only shows a lack of culture on the part of the French organizers. This isn’t edgy or original, and it certainly isn’t going to help those who claim to be marginalized gain acceptance, it is simply sacrilege and a lame attempt to denigrate the faith of those who make up a 1/3 of the world population in an event that is supposed to welcome all people. The only art on display was that of deception when they got called out.
Derision isn’t love.
Ridicule isn’t tolerance.

They lie to our faces and expect us to deny reality like they do, but you’re certainly not crazy for believing your own eyes. I guess I should have told my shop teacher to squint harder and see the stool rather than the weapon. But I was not that practiced in the art of deception.