Genetic research is a burgeoning field of study. It reveals the complexity of our physical form in a new way and also my own unique DME genotype.
For years medication was designed as a one size fits all solution. However, how my body responds to a medication and how your body responds to the same dosage could be vastly different. Not all people are created equal when it comes to their genetics.
One of those differences is DME genotype. DME is an abbreviation that stands for drug metabolism enzyme. Most drugs are designed to be metabolized through by a certain set of enzymes.
There are now labs that test genotype for drug compatibility. Some of us are “poor metabolizers,” others are “intermediate metabolizers,” and on the far end of the scale are the “ultra-rapid metabolizers.”
The implications are huge and there might be a day when drugs will be tailor made to suit our own unique individual body chemistry. Unfortunately, until that day, we are stuck using drugs that are like misfitting hand-me-downs.
Are people created as spiritual clones?
People are genetically diverse and different. We understand that and it is a reason to test before assigning drug prescriptions to treat people. But do we apply that same idea spiritually?
One thing I have noticed in my reading the Bible is that no two people were the same. The similarity of Biblical characters was not one of having the exact same spiritual journey or experience. Their strengths varied, as did their weaknesses, they also had a wide range of spiritual experiences, life challenges and gifts. The unifying factor of all was simply faith in God.
Take Abraham, for example, he was an old nomad wandering without an heir until God made him a promise. His transformative spiritual experience came late in life. He messed up in his attempt to reconcile the reality of his situation with what God told him and tried to do things his own way by impregnating a woman not his wife. But ultimately, despite his mistakes, he served the purpose God had designated for him and was blessed richly for it.
David was a young man, he was looked over as a leader for his age and sidelined to tend the sheep. But later he become symbolic of courageous faith to a nation for his slaying of Goliath. He went on to live a life full of missteps, he endured personal tragedy (as a result of his own corrupt deeds) and still ended up a hero of faith at the end of his story. He was described as a man after God’s own heart in the book of Acts.
Women, from prostitutes like Rehab to queens like Esther, from Deborah the warrior-judge to deaconesses to desperate widows, played their own unique roles in the Biblical faith narrative. They were all faithful in different ways, some were courageous women who shouldered tremendous tasks, some hospitable to prophets in keeping their homes and others were mothers who were favored by God.
Some of the strongest examples of faith were from those who were raised in captivity. They were exposed at a young age to the best of what a worldly king could offer and yet chose faith in God over the pleasures of princely wealth. Daniel, those three guys with long weird names who survived unscathed after being thrown in a furnace, and Moses who later led his people, are all examples of extraordinary faith.
Some of the worse cases of unbelief were found in those steeped in Biblical tradition who rejected Jesus. Their religious devotion and diligent study of Scripture did not save them. They were outwardly images of righteousness, they had all the knowledge of theology they knew to have and still missed the truth badly. Allegiance to rules and roles produced hypocrites.
What does this mean for established rules and roles?
The idea that spiritual journeys must follow a set pattern or time frame does not fit with the Biblical pattern. Yes, the Bible probably does make more mention of the exceptional characters and there were many faithful besides who were less the exception. There certainty are statistical averages of people too, but there is no average person and that is the lie of statistics.
Men, on average, are physically stronger and also born with other strengths over women. Women, on the other hand, also have their own unique strengths and abilities that make them generally superior to men in some areas. That is what makes men and women a natural pair—they are complimentary (or stronger together) because they are different rather than the same.
People of the same gender also, while having some obvious similarities, are very different. Paul alludes to this diversity often in his letters to the church. In 1 Corinthians 12 he draws a vivid analogy between the church and a human body. He compares people with different parts of the body that are reserved for unique purposes. He was illustrating that their could be unity (and strength) in our differences when we are connected together by a same love.
We understand nations do not survive if they are too divided. We also understand that an economy without diversity of talents and diversity of contributions is probably not going to be very strong. Thriving depends on cooperation between different parts rather than strict legalistic conformity. But is that logic applied to the church as a collection of its individual parts?
The unity of the church was supposed to be built around common love and faith, not on absolute monochromatic sameness of personality and perspectives. The church has unfortunately segregated by ethnicity, economic status, education, extremes of liberalism or conservativism, and along many other dividing lines of application. In our division we miss an opportunity to see our full potential as a body. Sadly, many seem to prefer images of themselves and doing things their own way over a commitment to love as Jesus loved.
Too often we create rules (or roles) to serve our own preferences rather than our fellows. Many complex religious rationales have been created to justify hierarchies of men in fancy array. Whole Biblical hermeneutics built around dominionism (in the model of the first Adam and Old Testament patriarchs) that serves the needs of selfish men rather than the cause of Christ.
It is an anathema, it is a horrible distortion of Scriptural narrative, when the example of Christ (the better Adam) who turned down worldly dominion (Matthew 4:8-9) and instead bent low to wash the feet of his disciples. It is tragic when the better way of Jesus is discarded for worldly dominion, it is selling a heavenly birthright for a bit of porridge.
There are spiritual constants, like love…
God’s love does not change. I believe one unifying theme of Scripture is God’s constant love for humanity. It is certainly the main message of the Gospel of Jesus Christ which is summed up eloquently:
“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16)
Belief is love:
“Before long, the world will not see me anymore, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you. Whoever has my commands and keeps them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love them and show myself to them.“ (John 14:19-21)
“My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. You are my friends if you do what I command. I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you. You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you so that you might go and bear fruit—fruit that will last—and so that whatever you ask in my name the Father will give you. This is my command: Love each other.“ (John 15:12-17)
When asked what is the “greatest commandment” Jesus answered:
“Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” (Matthew 22:36-40)
Paul expounded on what Christian love means practically:
“If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing. Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails…” (1 Corinthians 13:1-8)
“Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience. Bear with each other and forgive one another if any of you has a grievance against someone. Forgive as the Lord forgave you. And over all these virtues put on love, which binds them all together in perfect unity.“ (Colossians 3:12-14)
“Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace… speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ.” (Ephesians 4:2-3, 15)
Love is a spiritual concept, not a mere code of conduct, not a blind allegiance to doctrinal statements nor a slavery to traditional application or religious dogmas. Love is death to selfish ambition, dedication to an eternal goal and lives to serve the good of others. Love comforts, love encourages, love provides tangibly for needs and rebukes immorality.
If there is anything most lacking in the church today (and world in general) it is love. Sure, many love selectively, they love their own family, their own tribe (of race, gender, cultural group, religious denomination, social class, etc) and yet that is not the love of Christian faith. The love of Jesus transcends tribal difference, it extends beyond biological offspring, and returns multiplied.
One place our love is most lacking is in commitment to true discipleship. As part of his parting words, Jesus told his followers, “make disciples of all nations” (Matthew 28:19) but it seems that is a concept often lost. Discipleship is supposed to be something personal, interactive and ongoing. But it also requires sacrifice of time, energy and our own pursuits. Discipleship takes loads of patience and it is too easily replaced by a cheap imitation or neglected entirely.
It is easy to designate the difficult task of discipleship to a few in an effort to absolve ourselves of responsibility. It is easy for tailored and flexible discipleship to be displaced by one-size-fits-all cookie cutter solutions. However, having people sign on to a book of regulations enforced rigidly (without love) is not true discipleship and not the example Jesus gave for us to follow.
Ironically, by not disciplining as we ought, we are not only shortchanging those who need an example of love and grace to follow, we are also robbing ourselves of the full experience of Christian faith. Everything worth doing requires hard work and a dedicated effort. Loving others enough to disciple them in a way tailored to their individual needs is no exception to the rule. Real love takes effort.
People are unique and “fearfully and wonderfully made” according to Psalms. Programs with simplistic algorithms are not sufficient. People do not need more generic prescriptions or clunky twelve step programs. People need genuine authentic self-sacrificial living breathing Christian love and a real investment of faith. So don’t give what is second rate if you want first rate results.